<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election in Moldova – NATO perspective blocked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/2009/04/08/election-in-moldova-%e2%80%93-nato-perspective-blocked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/2009/04/08/election-in-moldova-%e2%80%93-nato-perspective-blocked/</link>
	<description>Welcome to AriRusila&#039;s BalkanPerspective - a personal perspective on events in western Balkans.  Topics of interest: Serbia, Kosovo province, EU enlargement, ICO/EUSR, Eulex, UN peacekeeping operations, western Balkans, crisis management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 01:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hakan</title>
		<link>http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/2009/04/08/election-in-moldova-%e2%80%93-nato-perspective-blocked/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>hakan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/?p=318#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>moldova&#039;n?n karedenize k?y?s? olsayd? amerike ve Nato&#039;nun bu ülkeye bak?? aç?s? de?i?ik olurdu.Yukar?daki yaz?lan paragrafa kat?l?yorum..Bu ülkede rus varl??? ve iç-d?? politikada a??rl??? oldukça fazla..NATO bu ülkeyi k?sa zamanda program? d???na alabilir...

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#039;1055386704 which is not a hashcash value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>moldova&#8217;n?n karedenize k?y?s? olsayd? amerike ve Nato&#8217;nun bu ülkeye bak?? aç?s? de?i?ik olurdu.Yukar?daki yaz?lan paragrafa kat?l?yorum..Bu ülkede rus varl??? ve iç-d?? politikada a??rl??? oldukça fazla..NATO bu ülkeyi k?sa zamanda program? d???na alabilir&#8230;</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#8217;1055386704 which is not a hashcash value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AriRusila</title>
		<link>http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/2009/04/08/election-in-moldova-%e2%80%93-nato-perspective-blocked/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>AriRusila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/?p=318#comment-863</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you could give link representing the other side&#039;s historical interpretation to add here in comments or article itself.

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#039;1055386704 which is not a hashcash value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you could give link representing the other side&#8217;s historical interpretation to add here in comments or article itself.</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#8217;1055386704 which is not a hashcash value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kosmopolit</title>
		<link>http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/2009/04/08/election-in-moldova-%e2%80%93-nato-perspective-blocked/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Kosmopolit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/?p=318#comment-862</guid>
		<description>&quot;A short historical representation&quot;? If you write it like that people might expect a balanced historical summary taking into account both sides of the story. But to link only to the &quot;official&quot; Transnistrian historical interpretation without any indication of the bias of the source is definitely misleading. Of course history is contested but in order to get background information (as you wanted to provide) I think it is necessary to show both sides of the story with a clear explanation of the sources.

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#039;1055386704 which is not a hashcash value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A short historical representation&#8221;? If you write it like that people might expect a balanced historical summary taking into account both sides of the story. But to link only to the &#8220;official&#8221; Transnistrian historical interpretation without any indication of the bias of the source is definitely misleading. Of course history is contested but in order to get background information (as you wanted to provide) I think it is necessary to show both sides of the story with a clear explanation of the sources.</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#8217;1055386704 which is not a hashcash value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

