<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Serbia on the road to EU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/2009/12/29/serbia-on-the-road-to-eu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/2009/12/29/serbia-on-the-road-to-eu/</link>
	<description>Welcome to AriRusila&#039;s BalkanPerspective - a personal perspective on events in western Balkans.  Topics of interest: Serbia, Kosovo province, EU enlargement, ICO/EUSR, Eulex, UN peacekeeping operations, western Balkans, crisis management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 01:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Giles</title>
		<link>http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/2009/12/29/serbia-on-the-road-to-eu/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arirusila.blogactiv.eu/?p=488#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>Ari Rusila,

thanks for the insight.  As a British anti-federalist, I can certainly relate to your suggestion that Serbia might choose a different path than full EU membership.  Even as things stand, options involving membership of the Economic Area, leaving a country free to manage its own external trade, and with far less interference in its domestic law-making, are available.  This situation must improve over time, in light of the EU&#039;s own reluctance to countenance Turkish membership.  Let&#039;s hope that the &#039;Europe of variable geometry&#039; is eventually attainable.

Re your: &quot;I think that at this moment it would be good idea to continue EU process but not because of fulfilling EU needs.&quot;

I would be sceptical of your apparent belief that Serbia can continue down the road towards full membership, and simply change direction later.  The danger is not simply from the &quot;EU elite in Brussels&quot; you refer to.   I wish you luck in preserving your country&#039;s independence, if that is your ambition, but be careful - your own political class will be just as much part of the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ari Rusila,</p>
<p>thanks for the insight.  As a British anti-federalist, I can certainly relate to your suggestion that Serbia might choose a different path than full EU membership.  Even as things stand, options involving membership of the Economic Area, leaving a country free to manage its own external trade, and with far less interference in its domestic law-making, are available.  This situation must improve over time, in light of the EU&#8217;s own reluctance to countenance Turkish membership.  Let&#8217;s hope that the &#8216;Europe of variable geometry&#8217; is eventually attainable.</p>
<p>Re your: &#8220;I think that at this moment it would be good idea to continue EU process but not because of fulfilling EU needs.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would be sceptical of your apparent belief that Serbia can continue down the road towards full membership, and simply change direction later.  The danger is not simply from the &#8220;EU elite in Brussels&#8221; you refer to.   I wish you luck in preserving your country&#8217;s independence, if that is your ambition, but be careful &#8211; your own political class will be just as much part of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

