AriRusila's Conflicts

‘I wish to separate from as many Palestinians as possible, as quickly as possible.’ (Isaac Herzog )

Nimetön (81)The failure to reach an agreement to Israel-Palestine conflict during last two decades has destroyed the belief within the respective societies that an agreement is possible in the foreseeable future. With this history the only conclusion to solve Israel-Palestine conflict is to find a new approach to the peace process. Recently Israeli Left has done exactly that.

On January 2016, at the annual Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) conference in Tel Aviv, the leader of Israel’s opposition and head of the Zionist Union party [a centre-left political alliance in Israel, established in December 2014 by the Israeli Labor Party and Hatnuah], Isaac Herzog, unveiled an alternative approach to the issue of Israel’s nearly 49-year old presence in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.

The main points of Herzog’s plan, as reported in the Israeli media, are these:

  • While there is no current possibility for a two-state solution, Israel will not annul the possibility either diplomatically or geographically for the future
  • Hamas will face “harsh” measures for any attacks from Gaza, including targeting their leaders, and eliminating their ability to communicate over television and internet.
  • Israel will complete the security barrier around the major settlement blocs. “We will be here and you, Palestinians, will be there,” Herzog said. “Live your lives, improve your economy, create employment. The blocs under Israeli sovereignty will be part of the permanent solution. They will serve as recipients of settlers from outside the major blocs.”
  • The barrier through Jerusalem will cut off Palestinian villages from the city. The Defense Ministry would be charged with granting permits to Palestinians who wish to enter the city to work.
  • Palestinians would have full civil authority, but not security authority in the West Bank. This would, presumably, remove the regime of building permits in many Palestinian areas, but the Israeli military will remain present throughout the entire West Bank.
  • Finally, Israel would help convene a regional security conference with “moderate” Arab states (like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, for example) to deal with ISIL and other regional security issues, presumably including Iran.

The opposition leader noted that he had warned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well as Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that a third intifada was imminent.

“I did not find Netanyahu to be a partner to my demands, nor was Abbas a partner. This is how we got to the state of insecurity in which Israel’s residents now find themselves. Both leaders don’t have the leadership skills, the power or courage to make painful compromises…. It’s a mirror image of two leaders on either side of a barrier, two frightened and panicking leaders who only want to remain in power, two leaders who are paralyzed by fear.”

Source: Haaretz

Politically, the idea “us here, them there” harkens back to Yitzhak Rabin, who used that as a campaign slogan in 1992. Later former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert proposed a similar unilateral separation in the West Bank. Herzog’s plan seems likely to garner support among the centrist, center-left and even parts of the center-right Israeli voter base. However there is also opposing voices in Labor party. According The Jerusalem Post Labor’s secretary-general, MK Hilik Bar, issued surprisingly fierce criticism of his party head, Isaac Herzog, in an audio tape revealed Tuesday evening [26th Jan 2016] by Channel 2. Bar condemns Herzog for telling French President Francois Hollande last week that attempts to broker a two-state solution were currently unrealistic. He told that if he was not secretary-general of the party, he would have attacked Herzog “10 times as hard” as MK Shelly Yacimovich earlier – and less politely. “What is this unnecessary, dangerous and delusional statement?” asks Bar. From her part Yacimovich criticizes Herzog for abandoning diplomacy with the Palestinians.

Israeli-Palestinian conflict roadmaps to peace

From my perspective a new framework is needed, even if some apparent negotiations start the outcome probably will be a placebo to status quo. Before Herzog’s plan I referred two new leftist initiatives in my article Constructive Unilateralism: Leftist Approach to Israel-Palestine Conflict‘it’s in our hands’ by Omer Bar-Lev, an MK for the Zionist Union and ‘Constructive unilateralism’ by Blue White Future, leftist think tank – which both in my opinion are steps forward and also to the right direction as well including required new roadmap for better future. A quote from Omer Bar-Lev, an MK for the Zionist Union. He concludes:

If Israel wants to be a democratic state, which it does, then it has to either grant them full citizenship rights, which will subsequently destroy Zionism (one state for two nations) or separate from the Palestinians (two states for two nations). In that case, Israel can keep the Zionist spirit. Then, it is for the Palestinians to decide to create their Palestinian State, which is in their interests and they will make their own decisions.

If peace negotiations don’t start, they fail again or regional solutions can’t be realized this time so from my viewpoint Israel could independently implement what I have called a ‘Cold Peace Solution’, a minimal level of peace relations, where Israel would annex main settlements from West-bank inside the security fence and return to negotiations about other than so solved border issue when both parties feel need to make a long term deal. This solution in my opinion is the best way forward and it even might be possible to implement. If unilateral solutions are made in the framework of constructive unilateralism so this approach might be the right roadmap towards more permanent two-state solution. Not so bad option compared status quo anyway from my perspective. ( More in Analysis: Resolving The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict )

un%20ocha%20barrier%20map2

 

 

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0
Author :
Print

Comments

  1. The plan is flawed and goes against the stance of the international community and the Palestinian policy that East Jerusalem will be part of a future Palestinian state. In this plan the connection with Jerusalem is blocked by the huge Israeli settlements around it. Secondly, there should be a compensation to the Palestinians for the loss of territory as envisaged in this plan. Thirdly, no security forces by the Israeli government in a Palestinian state, which would mean a continuing of the military rule, the main incitement of now-a-days uprising by the Palestinian youth. Fourthly, no mention of Gaza, which should be part of future planning. I could go on. Herzog is anyway not a big difference to the right-winged government under Netanyahu, as the mainstream left always went on with building settlements, which Ban Ki-moon correctly denounced in his speech to the UN security council. Israel should go back to the 1967 lines and no further wishy-washy.

Leave a Reply